Edit

Share via


Safe deployment best practices for Windows drivers

Safe deployment best practices for Windows drivers are essential for delivering a secure, reliable, and Windows-compatible user experience. This article outlines best practices for Microsoft hardware and firmware partners to build and execute robust deployment plans that minimize disruptions, inefficiencies, and device failures.

While some partners might choose to manage their own distribution processes outside Windows Update, use Windows Update whenever possible. Windows Update offers a controlled, secure, and efficient ecosystem that reduces the risk of incompatibility, security vulnerabilities, and user impact. For detailed guidance on distributing driver packages, see Distributing a Driver Package.

In alignment with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's (CISA) Safe Software Deployment Guidance, these best practices emphasize transparency, versioning, rollback planning, and secure software design - essential elements of modern driver deployment.

For more about Microsoft's driver security philosophy, see driver security guidance.

Safe deployment lifecycle for drivers

Driver safe deployment best practices are grouped into three stages of the deployment lifecycle:

  • Pre-deployment

    Focuses on planning, internal testing, Windows Hardware Quality Lab (WHQL) certification, validating dependencies, and aligning deployment criteria with business and engineering goals before distribution.

  • Distribution

    Covers the actual distribution of the driver, including using Windows Update when applicable, deploying a ring strategy, and following best practices for gradual rollout.

  • Post-deployment monitoring and maintenance

    Involves monitoring device health signals, analyzing telemetry, and pausing, rolling back, or updating deployments based on real-world performance.

Screenshot of safe deployment lifecycle diagram for Windows drivers showing pre-deployment, distribution, and post-deployment monitoring stages.

Each section provides actionable guidance to help partners ensure driver releases meet high standards of reliability, security, and performance throughout their deployment journey.

Pre-deployment testing and validation

Before distributing a driver, test, validate, and assess security to ensure a secure and reliable experience for end users. These steps prevent deployment problems, reduce support costs, and enhance user satisfaction.

For an overview of Microsoft's recommended end-to-end process, see the Developing, Testing and Deploying Drivers guide.

Final testing and validation

Before distributing a driver, test, validate, and assess its security. This step reduces the risk of regressions, security vulnerabilities, and user disruptions.

Security and code integrity

Driver security is critical for system stability, protection, and compliance with Windows driver policies.

  • Digitally sign your driver in accordance with Driver Signing requirements. Review the Driver code signing requirements for more compliance and policy guidance.

    • Properly sign all drivers intended for deployment, whether through Windows Update or alternate channels, to ensure integrity and trust.

    • Obtain Windows Hardware Quality Labs (WHQL) signatures for drivers, regardless of the distribution channel, including Windows Update, OEM-controlled channels, or vendor-controlled channels such as websites or enterprise-specific tools. By obtaining a WHQL release signature, Windows systems trust driver packages by default. Without it, extra configuration steps are required to establish trust by using alternate certificates, which introduces complexity and risk during deployment. The WHQL certification that you need to get a WHQL release signature validates that the driver passes Microsoft's compatibility tests and meets required security standards.

  • Follow Microsoft's Driver Security Checklist to minimize vulnerabilities.

  • Use Code QL at compile time and Driver Verifier at runtime to uncover potential security flaws.

  • Align your development practices with the Driver Security Guidance, which outlines the benefits of shipping secure, reliable drivers, and includes guidance on avoiding malicious or vulnerable code patterns.

Microsoft encourages organizations that develop and publish anti-malware drivers to participate in the Microsoft Virus Initiative (MVI), a program dedicated to aligning anti-malware technologies with Windows security standards.

Deployment planning

Strategic planning reduces risk, improves user experience, and ensures efficient delivery and support.

  • Define rollout strategies, such as gradual rollout, pilot deployments, regional releases, or hardware-targeted releases.

    • To reduce risk and monitor real-world behavior before global release, see Gradual Rollout.
  • Choose a deployment channel:

    • Use Windows Update for its controlled and secure infrastructure.
    • For publishing guidance, see Distribute Drivers through Windows Update.
    • If you manage distribution independently, ensure the same level of safety and monitoring.
  • Plan for failure scenarios by defining rollback criteria, identifying rollback candidates, and documenting escalation procedures.

  • To meet quality and delivery expectations, ensure alignment between engineering, QA, and business stakeholders.

For more information, see Create a Deployment Plan.

Distribution

To maintain system stability and user trust, you must ensure drivers reach users securely, reliably, and efficiently. The distribution phase focuses on publishing and delivering drivers by using a structured, resilient approach that uses Microsoft's built-in infrastructure. This section also documents safe practices for alternative distribution paths.

Windows Update and other distribution methods

Windows Update (recommended):

  • Offers secure, automatic, and controlled driver distribution.
  • Integrates with Windows servicing and feature updates.
  • Enables telemetry-driven gradual rollout and built-in rollback mechanisms.
  • Supports targeting by hardware ID, OS version, and other criteria.

Learn more in Distributing a driver package.

Publisher channels:

  • Might be necessary in niche or enterprise-controlled environments.
  • Require safety measures to match Windows Update protections:
    • Drivers should be securely packaged and undergo WHQL release signature. Even when drivers are deployed outside of Windows Update, they should still complete WHQL testing and be digitally signed. WHQL testing and driver signing ensure alignment with Microsoft's quality and security expectations, and maintain parity with protections offered by Windows Update.
    • Manual rollback mechanisms and version control.
    • Coordination with IT teams or end users to ensure safe installation.

Constraints on driver dependencies

This guidance applies to all distribution methods, including Windows Update, OEM portals, and enterprise-specific tools.

Windows doesn't guarantee or provide mechanisms for tightly coupled dependencies among driver packages. These dependencies include driver-to-driver, or driver-to-firmware relationships that rely on exact version matches to function correctly. Instead, any interaction among drivers, or between drivers and firmware, must occur through well-defined interfaces that use versioning to denote changes in the interface.

Drivers and firmware need to provide some level of forward and backward compatibility so the system continues running regardless of the mixture of driver and firmware versions. Windows doesn't support tightly coupled dependencies where exact version matches are required.

Deployment phases

Driver deployment is a multistage process that ensures security, reliability, and minimal disruption. The deployment phases—pilot deployment, gradual rollout, and full deployment—reduce risks and confirm driver stability before full distribution. CISA's Safe Software Deployment Guidance highlights the importance of a gradual rollout and includes a detailed deployment timeline. This timeline shows how these phases fit into the overall process. It highlights how organizations can monitor performance and test drivers thoroughly before wider distribution.

  • Pilot deployment (internal rollout):

    • Initial release to a limited test audience.
    • Used to validate behavior in real-world environments.
    • Enables quick response to regressions or compatibility problems.
  • Gradual rollout (deployment and canary testing):

    • Incrementally increases exposure based on telemetry and diagnostics.
    • Helps identify systemic problems while minimizing widespread impact.
    • Adjust rollout pace and scope based on quality metrics and device health.

Learn more in Gradual rollout for driver updates in Microsoft Hardware Dev Center.

  • Full deployment (controlled rollout):
    • Enabled after successful monitoring of pilot and gradual rollout phases.
    • Supports broader reach across compatible systems globally.

Post-deployment monitoring and maintenance

Actively monitor driver reliability after release to detect and fix potential problems.

Telemetry and issue detection

Issue response and driver updates

  • Release patches to address security vulnerabilities.
  • Provide hot fixes or new driver versions based on telemetry insights.
  • Prepublish rollback candidates and alternative drivers.
  • Communicate with Microsoft support or driver ship room channels.

For more information about security tools for incident response, see Incident response: Windows Security best practices for integrating and managing security tools.

End-of-support considerations

  • Plan to deprecate older drivers and transition users seamlessly.
  • Provide clear communication and support for users during transitions.

Summary

Safe deployment is a continuous process that includes:

  1. Thoroughly validating and assessing security before release.
  2. Using controlled distribution strategies to reduce risks.
  3. Actively monitoring deployments and resolving problems.

These guidelines help hardware and firmware partners improve deployment strategies and build a secure, reliable Windows ecosystem. These best practices align with Microsoft Windows security principles and support recommendations from organizations such as CISA. They promote a proactive and collaborative approach to software reliability and ecosystem health.